Here is a small list of gun control pros and cons. I have listed only a few of the gun control facts among the large number of gun control pros and cons since most of these have been widely discussed in gun control debates.
Let me start with arguments in support of gun control:
1) Gun control facts reveal that though the population of the United States is only 5 percent of the population of the world, the number of privately owned guns in the US is 50 percent of the privately owned guns in the world. This mismatch between the share of the population of the world and that of the number of guns available in the world is a strong factor in favor of gun control. This appears to be a strong point.
2) Gun control pros and cons should also include experiences of countries that implemented stricter gun control. These countries have been able to get positive results. Australia, for example, has found that after it had tightened the gun control laws, the gun violence was brought down by about 60 percent. This part of the gun death statistics is a strong factor in favor of stricter gun control laws for the US. This also counters the argument made by the anti gun control groups that allowing people to own guns will help in reduction of crime.
Here are the arguments against gun control that form a part of gun control pros and cons.
1) In a democracy, there cannot be any control. Hence there should be no gun control laws. This argument does not appear to be reasonable for two reasons. One, having controls is not against democracy. Control is a part of governance. Two, gun control has the aim of curbing violence, not gun ownership. Since violence can lead to anarchy, preventing anarchy is essential to help the cause of democracy.
2) The right to own and bear guns is a sovereign right given by the second amendment and this right cannot be taken away by other laws. This argument can be countered on the fact that since nearly 99 percent of the second amendment was created on the basis of inputs given by people with no legal background, amending the right given by this amendment may not be wrong.
The policy of the NRA not to accept any compromise cannot be included in gun control pros and cons.
There are many gun control articles that talk about the second amendment. One recent gun control essay completely ignored gun deaths and gun death statistics focusing instead on the idea that more guns in the hands of the public reduces crime. That’s crazy, there isn’t any evidence that having more guns reduces crime in the US.
Many on line gun control articles ignore the economic damages caused by gun deaths which are estimated at$3.7 billion a year. That is $3.7 BILLION! One is more likely to read about an “assault” on the constitution than the fact that children and women are much more likely to die if there’s a gun in their house. That’s a fact!
How can there be any rational discussion of gun control pros and cons when gun control facts are ignored? Sometimes a person might believe that the gun control debate is only about gun owners loosing the privilege of buying assault rifles while ignoring important facts such as there are presently about 89 guns for every 100 people in the USA! Gun owners need to stop crying about themselves and think of the greater good.
Why aren’t there more gun control essays about the harm of guns? It’s because of the NRA. The NRA gets most of its funding from weapons manufacturers. it spends millions in every election trying to defeat gun safety candidates. It raises the question: is the NRA a sports organization, a political organization or lobbyist for the gun industry?
Clearly the answer is political organization and lobbyist. Why else would pro NRA legislators pass write rules that block the National Institute of Health and CDC from even studying gun violence?! In a national debate on public health and safety the NRA has no place at the table. It’s interests are those of weapons makers not citizens.
Gun control is a matter of public safety not gun sales.
Can gun control facts be interpreted in different ways? I had never thought it was possible. But I am surprised at how some people look at gun control facts and pretend as if they have no significance. If this were not the case, some action would have been taken on the basis of control facts to check the growing occurrences of gun death.
Gun control facts present gun crime statistics in a way that the message conveyed by them cannot be missed. Gun control facts, apart from presenting gun death statistics, also reveal some information which can be shocking. For example, gun control facts show that there is a risk of guns getting into the hands of children who may handle them inappropriately. You may wonder how kids can have access to the guns. Gun control facts show that in 30 percent of the cases, children living in the homes of people owning guns are aware where the guns are kept. Nothing can be easier for these children than taking the guns into their possession if they want.
New gun control facts are being presented in gun control articles that are being written almost everyday. According to one gun control article, strong gun laws will be able to prevent not only murders but also suicides. This is not a speculative conclusion but a conclusion arrived at by studying the developments in countries that have enacted effective gun control laws.
Some people choose to ignore gun control facts and present strange reasons for opposing gun control. One of the arguments emanating from these people is that gun ownership is a right conferred by the second amendment which cannot be taken away. I call this argument as strange because any law is subject to change. Moreover, people who were behind framing about 99 percent of this legislation had no legal background. They did not even have a college education. So, a law created by such people cannot be considered unchangeable.
One of the reasons why the gun control facts have not produced the results they should have, is that some legislators supporting the National rifles Association (NRA) do whatever they can to prevent a strong gun control law being brought in. These legislators even prevent gun violence being studied by organizations like the National Institute of Health. Gun control facts are lost on these people.
Why should an average person be concerned with gun crime statistics? Day in and day out, we are flooded with so much of statistics that we are apt to be fed up with them. But gun death statistics cant be dismissed cursorily. These present the gun control pros and cons in perspective.
When we talk about gun crime statistics, we have to start with homicides. Homicides are so common that an average reader of the newspaper may not even pay attention to news items about them. But the information that a high percentage of homicides fall under gun deaths cannot but disturb even an impassive person.
Take another piece of gun crime statistics. This is about children. You will naturally be more concerned about it, because it concerns children. If you have a gun in your house, what are the chances of a kid in your house getting hold of it? If you think that the chances are remote, you will be startled by the gun control statistics that nearly 40 percent of the children can get hold of the guns from the safe places stored by their parents! Read this along with another data about children that regions that have more households with guns have also recorded more gun deaths of children.
Gun crime statistics cannot but cover homicides. Research shows that gun death forms an unusually high percent of 60 percent of homicides. And every year, about 30,000 people are killed by guns in America. There is no wonder that gun death statistics compiled for various countries show that the US occupies a place worse than South Africa does, when the number of deaths per 10,000 people is considered.
Gun control facts point out how even the United States Economy is affected by the evil of gun death. There is an estimated loss of $3.7 billions to the economy on account of gun deaths.
Gun crime statistics, thus, are of great help in understanding the issue of gun control in all its dimensions and make the gun control debate more meaningful.