Do you take notice of the gun control facts? Many people do not. Gun control facts have been constantly staring at us from the pages of newspapers, television news reports and discussions, gun control articles appearing in periodicals etc. But many people do not pay attention to them for two reasons. Statistics in general do not make interesting reading and so are gun crime statistics. This is understandable. But the second reason is disturbing. Many people believe that gun control facts need not be of concern to them. It is this attitude shown by a large number of people that enables anti gun control groups to aggressively promote their case without bothering to look at the gun control pros and cons.
if you look at a few gun control facts, you will understand why it is necessary for everyone to be concerned about gun death statistics. Here are some facts.
1) The number of deaths caused by guns in the United States is estimated to be 30,000 per year. Don’t you think that this figure is high and that gun crime should be curbed to make us all feel safer living in this great country?
2) The number of guns relative to the population is one of the highest for the US. There are 89 guns for every 100 Americans. This is nearly equal to one gun per person including just born children! Does this figure not look abnormally high?
3) Another information revealed by gun control facts is that about 60 percent of the murders involve the use of guns. It will be easy for you to see the connection between high gun ownership and a high rate of gun usage in crimes.
4) The gravity of the situation presented by the above gun control facts is compounded by the fact that children living in the areas that have a high gun ownership face a higher risk of getting killed by guns, compared to children living in other areas.
Unfortunately, these gun control facts do not seem to have any impact on the anti gun control lobbies. The NRA (National Rifles Association), which has been leading the anti gun law lobby goes to the extent of threatening the legislators that they will be defeated in the primaries if they do support the position of the NRA on the gun control issue.
Of late, we have been hearing reports that strengthening the gun control laws has been engaging the attention of the government. This should be heartening to those who have realized the importance of bringing in laws to check the growing incidence of gun crime. We cannot keep ignoring gun control facts that show the gravity of the situation so clearly that no one can miss the reality. We have been debating the gun control pros and cons for too long, without taking any action and allowing the situation to deteriorate.
People who have been watching the gun control debate will be aware of the facts relating to gun death. Gun crime statistics cover a range of factors from the extent of gun ownership in our country to the impact of gun legislation on crime in those countries that have brought in an effective gun control regime. The gun ownership data shows that the ratio of guns owned to the population is very high for the United States. This is revealed by the fact that people in our country own about half of the total guns available in the world, while the US population is only about 5 percent of the population of the world.
Another item of data that will strongly support the need for greater gun control is that countries that have taken the decision to go in for strong gun control laws have seen a significant decline in the number of murders. Gun control facts thus show that more guns lead to more gun violence and that greater gun control leads to decrease in crime.
In contrast, the arguments advanced by the anti gun control groups lack conviction. One of the claims made by these groups is that the right to gun ownership granted by the 2nd amendment in an inviolable right. The weakness of this argument stems from the fact that almost the entire law was based on the inputs provided by people who had no legal background. Another argument of these people that gun control has no place in a democracy ignores the fact that for democracy to survive, tyranny has to be curbed. Gun control laws are aimed not at preventing people from owning guns but at checking tyranny. But such arguments will have no impact on bodies like the NRA (National Rifles Association) who follow a policy of no compromise.
Some people seem to think that gun death is like an accident and has to be accepted as an inevitable event we have to face as and when it occurs. They are right in a way since both a gun death and an accident are preventable to a great extent. We have traffic rules to minimize the incidence of accidents. Should we not have gun control rules to check the occurrence of gun death?
Just as figures for accidents are compiled, studied and used for monitoring the situation, gun death statistics should also be studied and analyzed. Gun crime statistics reveal the shocking information about the incidence of gun death in our country. There are about 30,000 deaths occurring every year due to gun violence. If this is not shocking enough, more shocking information is revealed by gun control facts. One such information is that in the regions where more people have guns, more children are killed by guns. People who keep arguing that possession of guns will be the best protection to our families against attacks by anti social elements have to ponder over this question. Do we have to risk the precious lives of our children just for asserting our irrational beliefs?
People interested in learning about the gun control pros and cons will like to know about the impact of gun control laws. Has strict gun control legislation helped reduce gun crime in other countries? The answer is a resounding yes. We have the example of Australia which has been able to bring down gun related crimes by nearly 60 percent after tightening gun control laws.
Though the gun control debate is weighed heavily in favor of gun control based on gun control facts, opposition to gun control comes from some quartets. The National Rifles Association (NRA) has been particularly carrying on a campaign against gun control. The activities of NRA and its indifference to the tragedy of gun death make one wonder whether it is an association of sportsmen as claimed by it or it is a lobbyist forum.
There are many gun control articles that talk about the second amendment. One recent gun control essay completely ignored gun deaths and gun death statistics focusing instead on the idea that more guns in the hands of the public reduces crime. That’s crazy, there isn’t any evidence that having more guns reduces crime in the US.
Many on line gun control articles ignore the economic damages caused by gun deaths which are estimated at$3.7 billion a year. That is $3.7 BILLION! One is more likely to read about an “assault” on the constitution than the fact that children and women are much more likely to die if there’s a gun in their house. That’s a fact!
How can there be any rational discussion of gun control pros and cons when gun control facts are ignored? Sometimes a person might believe that the gun control debate is only about gun owners loosing the privilege of buying assault rifles while ignoring important facts such as there are presently about 89 guns for every 100 people in the USA! Gun owners need to stop crying about themselves and think of the greater good.
Why aren’t there more gun control essays about the harm of guns? It’s because of the NRA. The NRA gets most of its funding from weapons manufacturers. it spends millions in every election trying to defeat gun safety candidates. It raises the question: is the NRA a sports organization, a political organization or lobbyist for the gun industry?
Clearly the answer is political organization and lobbyist. Why else would pro NRA legislators pass write rules that block the National Institute of Health and CDC from even studying gun violence?! In a national debate on public health and safety the NRA has no place at the table. It’s interests are those of weapons makers not citizens.
Gun control is a matter of public safety not gun sales.
Facts are facts and so are gun control facts. Then why do we choose to ignore them? Though gun control facts are made available to us almost continuously and the picture presented by the gun crime statistics show that gun control is the need of the hour, this issue still remains unresolved. We can ignore gun death statistics and keep enjoying uncontrolled gun ownership only if gun control facts are not facts but lies. But everyone knows that only gun control facts are for real and they show how the gun crime scene of our country has been worsening every day.
Let us take just two gun control facts and see what message we can logically derive from them. Let us also examine how certain groups react to gun control facts.
1) Gun control articles have brought out the information on gun ownership of Americans. When we look at the number of guns available in the United States and see how this number is related to the population of the country, we are faced with an astounding revelation. For every 100 people in our country, there are 89 guns. This means that the number of guns in the US is very close to the number of people living in the country.
2) Gun control facts also indicate that countries that have made gun laws stronger are able to bring down the number of guns. Comparing this information with the gun ownership in the US, we can see that gun death is directly proportional to gun ownership!
How does the National Rifles Association (NRA)react to these gun control facts? The NRA has placed two arguments in the gun control debate. First, it says that since the right to own guns is a right given to us by the 2nd amendment, it cannot be touched by any other law. The NRA is not unaware of the fact that close to 99 percent of this amendment was based on the data prepared by people with no legal education.
Another argument presented by the NRA to counter the gun control facts is that in a democracy, there cannot be a restriction on people owning guns. The NRA has ignored the fact that gun control measures have the aim of curbing anarchy that may result from uncontrolled gun ownership and the idea is not to prevent people from owning guns. Gun control facts should be understood in their perspective.
The gun control debate like any other debate should be clear about the issues involved. A healthy debate will present the gun control pros and cons with supporting information so that people who follow the gun control debate will be able to decide their own stand on the issue. Some of the issues to be considered in a gun control debate are gun control facts and the relative merits of the points made by either side.
A gun control debate should invariably discuss gun death statistics. What do these statistics reveal? Apart from showing the number of gun deaths per year and how the number of gun crimes in a region is related to the number of guns owned in that region, gun death statistics also indicate that gun crime impacts the economy as well. Every year, the United States is losing a whopping $3.7 billion as a consequence of gun crime.
One of the arguments we often hear in the gun control debate is the claim that crime can be reduced by equipping people with guns. This claim is not backed by any evidence. In fact, evidence only shows that having more guns results in increase in crime. gun control articles that contribute to a gun control debate should discuss such claims and bring out this fact so that people will not be swayed by such baseless claims.
Gun control debate should also examine some theoretical arguments presented by the pro gun control groups. One such argument is that gun control laws have no place in a democracy. This argument misses the point that tyranny is the antithesis of democracy and hence any kind of tyranny including the lawlessness created by gun violence should be curbed by laws. So, anti gun laws do not seek to prevent guns but only tyranny.
Gun control debate can be vitiated by taking the debate away from the real issues. This is often done by certain anti gun control groups including the National Rifles Association (NRA). The NRA, though considered to be an association of sportsmen, in practice, functions as a lobby. Participants in the gun control debate should also bring to light the fact that the NRA is not a political organization but just a lobbyist body.
Why should we look at gun crime statistics? The obvious answer is that by looking at gun crime statistics, we have a better understanding of the gun crime scene. But this does not happen with some people. For them, gun death statistics are just some numbers with no significance. This attitude may be assumed for two reasons. Some people do not understand the significance of gun crime statistics. For some other people, gun control facts are irrelevant since they do not support their side in the gun control debate!
The second category of people, as you might have guessed, belong to the anti gun control lobby. This lobby is led by the National Rifles Association (NRA). Though the NRA is an association by its name, it is little more than a lobby of people claiming the right to own guns irrespective of the consequences of uncontrolled gun ownership revealed by gun crime statistics. The NRA has a policy of not compromising on its rigid stand against gun control. Obviously, gun crime statistics will be of no concern to the NRA and its supporters.
Te picture presented by gun crime statistics will be disturbing for anyone but uncomfortable for the anti gun control groups. Let us take a look at just a few facts revealed by gun control statistics. The number of deaths caused by the use of guns every year in the United States is estimated to be in the range of 30,000. Another fact is that the gun ownership ratio is the highest for the US. People in our country own about 50 percent of the guns in the world though our country holds only about 5 percent of the population of the world. We can see a clear correlation between high rate of gun ownership and high rate of gun deaths.
Another disturbing fact revealed by gun crime statistics is that in places that have a large number of people owning guns, not only the number of murders but also the number of suicides is high. Thus gun crime statistics show that unrestricted ownership will result in not only a large number of murders but also a large number of suicides.
Everyday, several people become victims of gun death. We all know that death is inevitable but we cannot say the same thing about gun death. Gun death, after all, is very much preventable, if only we are willing to act.
Gun death statistics are staring at us from the newspaper pages but most of us just ignore it treating them to be of no concern to us. We should understand that though statistics are given in figures, they are not just numbers. Gun crime statistics should be read like a report on crimes committed by the use of guns. Such an attitude will make us identify with the cause of gun control instead of treating gun death as yet another crime report in a newspaper.
Who is concerned about gun death? If we look at the fact that a large number of articles being written about gun crime, we can understand that a number of people are concerned at the tragedy of gun death and want something done to check gun crime. On the other hand, we have certain lobbies that are keen on preventing any strong gun laws from coming into existence. These lobbies are led by the National Rifles Association (NRA).
The NRA and its supporters counter the arguments in favor of preventing gun death by invoking the second amendment. Their logic is that the right of gun ownership given to us by this law should not be taken away. The flaw in this argument is that any law is subject to change. It is also relevant to remember that 99 percent of the information for the second amendment was prepared by people who never went to college, leave alone the fact that they had no legal background. The supporters of NRA also claim that in a democracy, we cannot have laws controlling gun ownership. They ignore the fact that democracy can survive only if anarchy is prevented and gun control measures are a way to prevent lawlessness.
Legislators who should be in the know of gun control facts are expected to weigh gun control pros and cons and act appropriately. But we have some pro NRA legislators who have no qualms about making rules to ensure that the National Institute of Health will be hampered in its efforts to study the problem of gun violence leading to gun death.
What is the role of gun control articles? In general some articles have the purpose of entertaining the readers and some have the purpose of enlightening them. Gun control articles fall under the second category. By discussing the gun control pros and cons, gun control articles help the readers have a clear understanding of gun control facts.
Gun control articles give a lot of statistics. The gun crime statistics given by them show the severity of the gun control issue. I read in a gun control article that gun death is not an isolated event affecting only an individual. It affects even the economy. The United States suffers an economic loss of 3.7 billion dollars every year on account of gun deaths. People who learn this kind of facts from gun control articles will definitely ponder over the need for measures to control gun ownership.
Why do people own guns? The reason given by the pro gun people is that owning a gun will protect us from possible attacks by criminals. But gun control articles reveal another side of gun ownership. They quote gun crime statistics to show that in about 40 percent of the households that have guns, children will be able to access the guns because they know where the guns are kept. After learning this fact, people will think twice about owning a gun. This is how gun control articles spread the awareness about the consequences of unrestricted gun ownership.
Gun control articles also highlight another fact by analyzing gun death statistics. The US fares worse than South Africa when we compare the ratio of gun deaths to the number of people living in the country. This is a shocking revelation about the perils of gun ownership. Gun control articles have also examined the claim made by the pro gun lobby that having more guns will help reduce crime and found that there is no evidence to support this dubious claim.
In spite of all such gun control facts discussed in detail by gun control articles, there are some legislators who are determined to ensure that the demand for strict gun control laws is weakened. They create rules which will prevent the CDC from studying gun violence and hence prevent more facts coming out. But the gun control facts already highlighted by gun control articles create sufficient ground for stricter gun control.
The internet and the airwaves are flooded with gun control articles these days. Since the tragedy in Newtown there is a new energy to confront failed gun laws. However, most people feel that the gun control pros and cons debate is decidedly skewed in favor of those who are pro weapon. We deserve to know ALL the gun control facts.
A recent well investigated gun control essay in Huffington Post sheds some light on the situation. While the the sentiment of millions upon millions of Americans is for stricter gun laws, they are unorganized. On the other hand, the tiny minority that favors easy access to extremely devastating military assault weapons and fewer rules for handgun purchasing is highly organized.
The reason for the imbalance in the debate is the NRA. The National Rifle Association grew from a harmless sportsman’s group dedicated to promoting gun safety into one of the loudest, most well organized lobbying corporations in America. The NRA is the marketing arm of the $12 BILLION arms industry. They do not want Americans to know gun control facts.
The NRA now has a 300 million dollar annual budget. With only about four million members paying $25 a year, the balance of $299 million comes from corporations, endorsements and the donations of arms manufacturers.
The NRA has worked relentlessly to both frame and confuse the debate. Gun control facts are distorted and replaced with false constitutional issues. They encourage a small army of gun extremists to write internet stories that confuse the public. They have established themselves as the voice of gun owners while in fact their policies directly oppose the wishes of even their own membership. NRA members are as horrified with the number of gun deaths in America as anyone else. A poll conducted in 2012 by Republican pollster Frank Luntz for Mayors Against Illegal Guns, found that 74 percent of NRA members support mandatory background checks for all gun purchases. The NRA is adamantly opposed to this simple rule.
Americans deserve to get all the gun control facts and to hear a debate presented on an equal footing. That means the NRA, as an industry lobbyist, must be excluded from the conversation.